January 30, 2019 1,332
To meet the requirements for a UK visitor visa a migrant must convince the UK Government decision-maker that they have access to sufficient funds, that they are not intending to carry out any prohibited activities, that they are a “genuine” visitor and that they will leave the UK at the end of their visit.
There is also another requirement: that a visitor must not spend more than six months in the UK on any one occasion, and not more than six months in any 12 months. (If you hold a long-term UK visitor visa you will see the figure of “180” written on it: this indicates that you should not spend more than 180 days per year in the UK.)
This six-month principle may not be unreasonable. If you are spending more than six months per 12 months in the UK you look less like a visitor and more like a resident. To put it another way, if you are spending more than half your time in the UK it looks as if you are making the UK your main home. We would go so far as to say that the rule seems fair.
So far so good, but it is not as simple as this.
One of the visitor immigration rules says that the applicant must satisfy the decision-maker that they “will not live in the UK for extended periods through frequent or successive visits”.
What does this actually mean? It’s very difficult to say. What is it supposed to add to the six-month principle? Again, very difficult to say. Not for the first time the immigration rules are impenetrable.
We can probably understand that the word “extended” relates to not spending too long in the UK, but which is in any case already covered by the six-month rule.
And the word “successive” simply means that one thing happens after another. If you make five visits to the UK they are inevitably successive, ie one of them happens after another. It does not seem possible to attach any meaning to this.
The word “frequent” is also worrying. If you make ten visits of a few days each in the course of six months, does this mean that you have broken the rule, even though you have not come anywhere near to breaking the six-month rule?
Well, maybe. The meaning of the wording is just not clear, and we have experienced cases where an applicant has been refused a visitor visa because they have previously spent a lot of time on visits in the UK but short of the six-month limit.
And it is a strange and interesting fact that the published Home Office policy guidance states that there is no “6 in 12 months” rule for visitors. (Which contradicts Home Office guidance given elsewhere, which strongly implies that there is such a rule or principle.)
We detect a sinister motive here. If the Home Office say there is no 6/12 month rule this enables them to refuse somebody who has visited frequently but not broken the rule. If there is no rule then such a person cannot argue that they have not broken the rule, because there is no such rule! But, on the other hand, if they have broken the rule the Home Office can rely on other parts of the guidance and say that they have broken the rule and thus refuse their application.
Bearing all this confusing information in mind our advice is this. It is best to limit your visits to the UK as much as possible and to stay well under the six-month limit. It is also best not to visit too many times per year. It seems that it is better, for example, to visit twice in a year and stay a bit longer rather than visit three times in a year for shorter periods.
This approach may seem illogical but we believe that it is practical. Some people may think that preparing visitor visa applications is simple and straightforward but this is not entirely the case. Sometimes there are complexities that are not always obvious.
At Get UK Visa we have a lot of experience in visitor visa applications, and we can help you make the strongest possible application.
Nov 04, 2020
As we all know, European free movement will finish on 31 December 2020, and after that date EEA nationals will be treated the same as everybody else. The points-based system will carry on but its nomenclature will be changed somewhat. The Tier 2 scheme will be renamed the “Skilled Workers” scheme and the Tier 4 […]
Oct 16, 2020
The Immigration Health Surcharge (IHS) is a charge that has to be paid by many visa applicants in addition to the visa application fee, but those in some categories (eg visitors, refugees, EEA nationals, settlement applicants) do not have to pay it. The money goes towards the National Health Service, and is justified by the […]
Oct 05, 2020
As everybody knows, EU free movement will end on 31 December 2020, after which EEA nationals will be treated the same as everybody else. There will be a new points-based system, which will cover both working routes and study routes. The Home Office has now provided details about the new study route, which opened on […]
I do appreciate the professional work/service of Mr. Adel Temory along his team at GET UK VISA for the support in my application for the British naturalisation process. He has an extremely professional knowledge/experience and is time bound communicator. I strongly recommend GET UK VISA to everyone who is trying to get a UK visa/settlement or citizenship..
I highly recommend GET UK VISA! My experience with them was amazing. They are accessible and honest which makes you feel instantly at ease. Without their help I will probably still be waiting for my husband visa approval. We are definitely pleased and could have not asked for anything more! If you are looking for an affordable and professional lawer, that makes everything run smoothly, then you have found it! I will always recommend GET UK VISA to anyone needing an immigration lawyer.
thanks a lot for everything.you are the best in uk and I really appreciate about your knowledge.👏👏👏👏
I recommend Get UK Visa professional group. they helped me to get my fiancé visa responsibly. I would ask them to help me again for my future visas certainly.
I can not be more happy with GET UK VISA, they have done a great help to resolve my immigration problem. I highly recommend them. Many thanks